Media using Petraeus sex scandal to further avoid discussing Benghazi
The lapdog news media has covered for the Obama administration on the Benghazi scandal since the attacks occurred in September. They are now using General David Petraeus’ sex scandal as a means to further avoid the subject.
Does it seem like the media is putting Benghazi on the back-burner in favor of dissecting Gen Petraeus’ love life? Priorities…just saying
— Jocelyn Lanham (@Hosselyn) November 11, 2012
Sophomoric lamestream media is really too much to bear anymore. Their focus is on “Petraeus’s girlfriend” when the real story is #Benghazi
— Joe the Patriotic (@joethepatriotic) November 11, 2012
Is the media’s obsession with Petraeus hypocritial (Clinton) or a way to avoid talking about Benghazi?
— Mick Coyle (@mickcoyle) November 11, 2012
This Petraeus news stinks of something very bad. The Benghazi debacle also stinks of something more sinister. The media just ignores it.
— Jack Riashi, Jr. (@JKRiashiJr) November 10, 2012
@nrocorner BETTING TIME: THE PETRAEUS SCANDAL GETS HEARING FIRST AND MORE MEDIA TIME THAN BENGHAZI COVER-UP. RT IF YOU THINK SO, TOO.
— Tea Party Boise, Inc (@TeaPartyBoise) November 11, 2012
What if Petraeus fessed up to this old affair and resigned in order to try to make the lame stream media report on #BENGHAZI?
— RoseThistleArtworks (@rosethistleart) November 11, 2012
— Noyb (@BORNCURIOUS) November 11, 2012
I can’t wait till the mainstream news media shows us a “time line of Petraeus’s affair” while not wandering about the time line of #Benghazi
— Robert(@deepereyes) November 10, 2012
I’m getting the feeling that this whole Petraeus affair is just what the media wanted to sweep the voter fraud, and #Benghaziunder the rug
— Tyler (@Tango_06) November 11, 2012
What’s the difference between Benghazi and the Petraeus sex scandal? One heavily damaged a reputation, and the other left four Americans dead.